How Human Testers Enhance Software Safety

A collection of DevSecOps instruments is accessible to automate evaluations, audits, exams, and scans all through the event pipeline, which have turn out to be customary in software safety testing. GitLab’s survey additionally discovered 68% of ops groups have utterly or largely automated their software program growth lifecycle processes.

Deployment calls for have put stress on organizations to combine safety evaluation and testing all through their SDLC with out slowing down. Automation instruments match these wants effectively, particularly static scanning instruments that simply present exhaustive outcomes quicker than any human might. However there are basic limitations to the kinds of vulnerabilities and weaknesses that may be discovered solely with scanning software program or automated exams.

Human testers – recon specialists, moral hackers, pentesters, and code reviewers – generally is a boon to your SDLC. Whereas automated testing instruments are glorious at scaling to search out identified patterns, people spot unknown vulnerabilities and course of flaws.

What Automation Misses

All automated testing instruments are restricted to discovering what they’re programmed to search out. Automated scanning covers a large variety of identified vulnerabilities and unhealthy coding practices. However the true danger your group wants to organize for is the unknown vulnerabilities that merely can’t be discovered with such instruments.

Organizations following all the usual practices for safety testing are stunned by how rapidly HackerOne’s human safety consultants uncover vulnerabilities missed by conventional instruments and testing. Almost 85% of bug bounty applications uncover no less than one excessive or crucial vulnerability.

For extra on how HackerOne helps cut back cybersecurity danger throughout the SDLC, learn our How Human Testers Enhance Software Safety infographic.